US election

[R.C]

cast your votes now..

[Naz]

J.K

[Lass]

Originally posted by Naz@Nov 2 2004, 11:39 AM

J.K

[gixxerfreak]

J.K

[R.C]

why J.K?

[Guest BoBOKik]

the one who can tell a better fairy's tale and can keep american citizen afraid.. very very afraid..

[299]

Bush..he's strong at war.

Peace.

[Naz]

no way.

Bush is strong at STARTING war without concrete proof, spending billions, sending the army to get killed and to kill the innocent, duping the citizens and creating false propaganda about something which was never true in the first place.

 

Enough said. It's time the blind Americans make their own change, and give us back the peace of mind, economy and "world peace" hic~

 

and hope you guys watched Fahrenheit 9-11. watched it in PS and the only show that I watched with a lot of angmohs who clapped the effort of Michael Moore at the end of the show

[Rikk]

but kerry is fickle minded.. keep changing his views..

 

not that im saying bush is great but at least he believes in himself..

[R.C]

bush is in the lead...

 

err.. at least for now...

[tempest]

Its 3.06pm now. Bush 249, Kerry 211. The first to hit 270 electoral votes wins.

 

From

 

http://www.cnn.com/

[R.C]

quite a close fight...

[tempest]

Very close indeed. But Bush has quite a commanding lead in Ohio, which makes him quite likely to be the victor. Ohio holds 20 electoral votes.

[n00b]

seems like its gonna be bush~

if he wins dunno will osama come back

[Rikk]

osama will hit US no matter who won the election..

 

Kerry on the other hand, might bow to political pressure regarding middle east..

[newman]

no matter who wins...

nobody can bring back those who lost their lives bcoz of e INVASION

especially civilians

[Lass]

dammit bush again....

[Naz]

stewpit stewpit americans!!!!

 

talk like as tho they hated bush to the core but in the end, its ALL THE SAME!!!

[299]

It's BUshy again.....

[tempest]

Hopefully, Bush will re-examine his foreign policies after securing a second term. The world will not be a safer place with his style of unilateralism.

 

5 people voted for Bush in this poll. Just curious, what's the reason?

[299]

Yeah...kill more terrorists maybe OSAMA to save many innocent hostages....

[tempest]

Originally posted by ProjectD@Nov 4 2004, 03:14 PM

Yeah...kill more terrorists maybe OSAMA to save many innocent hostages....

I don't think anyone can put the blame squarely on Osama's shoulders. If you look long and hard towards the US policy in the Israel/Palestine issue, Osama isn't totally wrong. The great US of A hasn't been very fair to the Palestinians too. If you have seen the news, Israeli troops are leveling Palestinian towns when they 'see the need to'. Nothing much is done to re-dress the duress suffered by the innocent Palestinian civilians. One might point to the suicide bombers inflicting casualties in Israel. But which came first, Palestinian repression or Palestinian retaliation?

 

The EU were recently contemplating sanctions against Israel. At least a collective group there feels that there is something not quite right is going on...

[299]

Originally posted by tempest@Nov 4 2004, 03:38 PM

I don't think anyone can put the blame squarely on Osama's shoulders. If you look long and hard towards the US policy in the Israel/Palestine issue, Osama isn't totally wrong. The great US of A hasn't been very fair to the Palestinians too. If you have seen the news, Israeli troops are leveling Palestinian towns when they 'see the need to'. Nothing much is done to re-dress the duress suffered by the innocent Palestinian civilians. One might point to the suicide bombers inflicting casualties in Israel. But which came first, Palestinian repression or Palestinian retaliation?

 

The EU were recently contemplating sanctions against Israel. At least a collective group there feels that there is something not quite right is going on...

but still tat doesn't mean to blow up the twin towers with many innocent lives there....juz imagine what if ur parents, siblings, ur loved ones are there. But tat doesn't mean by addressin innocent, that they ( terrorists ) can go around killin lives....i dn't mind to offend...

[tempest]

Originally posted by ProjectD@Nov 4 2004, 03:58 PM

but still tat doesn't mean to blow up the twin towers with many innocent lives there....juz imagine what if ur parents, siblings, ur loved ones are there. But tat doesn't mean by addressin innocent, that they ( terrorists ) can go around killin lives....i dn't mind to offend...

Not offended in the least bit, we are all learning all the time.

 

We all will agree that taking innocent lives in attempts to resolve political issues isn't correct May it be attacking people's country, destroying people's buildings, etc. Everybody can afford to concede a little to make the world a better place but don't understand why that's not the case. You got me thinking awhile ago, bro. I went to search for a bit of info on the Palestinian issue. Go check it out if you are interested!

 

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpa/ngo/history.html

 

The best way, I feel, to fight terrorism is Singapore's way. To nab the problem before it becomes a problem.

[Rikk]

frankly speaking, i feel that the 2 of them are of the same calibre.. juz that as the head of the country (VERY POWERFUL ONE), u gotta look at things on a bigger picture.. decisions are always hard to make and there are always people that opposes them.

 

Juz don't like the fact that Kerry keep changing his views to "flow with the wind", if he can't even hold on his own, how is he gonna lead a country?

 

Will he try to "please" everyone for the sake of keeping his post and neglect his duties as a president?

 

 

 

Juz my thoughts....