Honda RVF400/NC35

[ravenSP]

some people (you know who you are) need to read properly. and no im not talking about you sean.

 

 

i posted those out of irritation. my bad. but sometimes it gets irritating when someone really posts replies and questions when they could get the info the page before. leo rider was saying how much for carb, which was actually posted the day before on the prev page. seriously, i still think leo rider's post was useless. he said price, but he didnt state WHERE. what use was that anyway? the page before already had the price stated there. i know price varies, but it's around that price yes?

 

i apologise for starting this kinda debate, i'll keep my opinions to myself next time. lets end this yes?

[ravenSP]

oh i would like to add, i dont have anything about people chatting A BIT here. of course its MUCH harder to find info, but you cant really stop them yes? i do it sometimes also. but its those posts which i find (ok la my opinion) are totally useless that irritates me. also those who really make ALOT of 'chat' posts. you can (note, i said can)have one whole page, of 2 people just talking c***. wana talk c*** might as well just go irc/msn or something? or even meet up for coffee and talk c***?

 

as i said, i apologise for starting this. what i posted so far are just all my opinions.

[Guest TachiTJRS]

If I may gentlemen, say just one thing about this whole matter. I have been reading more than posting because if you notice I make every post count. I agree with Filbert and Shay and Ghost rider all at the same time but on different points. I believe that a forum disscussion should promote healthy exchange of ideas and information (Please read my past post a page or two back) BUT.... two clog up two pages of exchange between two people about where to meet and the horrible weather is to me, unacceptable. THAT is irritating for some users who are genuinely looking for information.

 

I have withheld saying anything until now because I wanted to see how long this debate would last.

 

I hope my post will be the last on this matter. I hope after this everyone will return to other discussions.

 

The Force V4 forum will be up before the holidays so we all can chat, talk c*** and find really useful info in one place divided by gates and doors and corridors..

 

Thank You!

[Shay]

Originally posted by GhostRider17@Jan 11 2005, 11:56 AM

it seen like u also dun understand ... is my England too deep for u ( so xiao di asking how much for carb service & valve clearance also off topic lah... then leo rider reply also consider chatting... find nothing wrong mah if someone asking how much is it ... then r u saying this information were not useful mah .... )

then r u telling me THIS WILL NOT TECHNICAL ISSUE . if someone asking how come my bike like or how come like tat.... ans me this question lah .... if u think this not technical issue then wat is yr so called technical issue i would like to heard

sighhh.... now that i still have abit of time b4 work, let me put it in perspective for you,

 

Its not becoz your english is too deep for me..must you be so insulting to me my fren? Remeber what i said about frenship above forum? or have you forgotten?

 

1stly.... there is no need to dig up the excerpts from the xiao di, Leo Rider and Filbert arguements...i read All about it. that is why i wrote the 1st post in response to this.

 

In it, i did not state whoz fault isit nor was i taking any sides. What i was trying to say was; It is just experience from my 1.5 years in this forum that these kinda arguments sometimes spring up....why? becoz of a very basic reason...The Thread is too clustered with mindless chatters. It just gets annoying to read thru other people's mindless conversations (not pinpointing anybody) and sometimes not even finding a single piece of technical info answered.

 

( Newbies....u all wana know why your questions sometimes goes unanswered that is why!! When the pages gets too filled with mindless chatters, no one would wana read thru it all and sometimes misses all the tech questions.)

 

Finger pointing and trying to dig the past conversations up to see who is at fault and all is pointless. We need to arrest the problem instead. That is what the majority of my posts was about anyway.

 

At 1st also, you were on the same topic as me on chattings in this thread. you asked me why chatting is no good and that you agree with Ken that chatting foster relationship so i replied accordingly. Then you asked me what is the club for and now you get all fired up about whats in LEo rider and Filbert's conversation???

 

You know, it was quite a different issue we (u and i ) were discussing ----The need to chat here and what is in FIlbert and Leo's arguements. 2 different things. We were toking about the general problem of the thread which sprang from my response to Leo and Fil's disagreement and not the specifics of thier disagreement at all.

 

So i dun see what is your point? Maybe you wana cast aside your personal emotions and be more objective about all this becoz you are not trying together to solve the problem.. you are aggravating it.

 

Also, I'm not obliged to explain to you what is considered technical issues becoz frankly i do not have the time and you oredy know what is the answer.

[GhostRider17]

Originally posted by Shay@Jan 11 2005, 02:25 PM

sighhh.... now that i still have abit of time b4 work, let me put it in perspective for you,

 

Its not becoz your english is too deep for me..must you be so insulting to me my fren? Remeber what i said about frenship above forum? or have you forgotten?

 

1stly.... there is no need to dig up the excerpts from the xiao di, Leo Rider and Filbert arguements...i read All about it. that is why i wrote the 1st post in response to this.

 

In it, i did not state whoz fault isit nor was i taking any sides. What i was trying to say was; It is just experience from my 1.5 years in this forum that these kinda arguments sometimes spring up....why? becoz of a very basic reason...The Thread is too clustered with mindless chatters. It just gets annoying to read thru other people's mindless conversations (not pinpointing anybody) and sometimes not even finding a single piece of technical info answered.

 

( Newbies....u all wana know why your questions sometimes goes unanswered that is why!! When the pages gets too filled with mindless chatters, no one would wana read thru it all and sometimes misses all the tech questions.)

 

Finger pointing and trying to dig the past conversations up to see who is at fault and all is pointless. We need to arrest the problem instead. That is what the majority of my posts was about anyway.

 

At 1st also, you were on the same topic as me on chattings in this thread. you asked me why chatting is no good and that you agree with Ken that chatting foster relationship so i replied accordingly. Then you asked me what is the club for and now you get all fired up about whats in LEo rider and Filbert's conversation???

 

You know, it was quite a different issue we (u and i ) were discussing ----The need to chat here and what is in FIlbert and Leo's arguements. 2 different things. We were toking about the general problem of the thread which sprang from my response to Leo and Fil's disagreement and not the specifics of thier disagreement at all.

 

So i dun see what is your point? Maybe you wana cast aside your personal emotions and be more objective about all this becoz you are not trying together to solve the problem.. you are aggravating it.

 

Also, I'm not obliged to explain to you what is considered technical issues becoz frankly i do not have the time and you oredy know what is the answer.

shay honestly maybe u dun know my character .... ... i purposely divert the words to wait filbert to post and wat he had done .. so no offence to u

[GhostRider17]

Originally posted by filbert@Jan 11 2005, 01:28 PM

some people (you know who you are) need to read properly. and no im not talking about you sean.

 

 

i posted those out of irritation. my bad. but sometimes it gets irritating when someone really posts replies and questions when they could get the info the page before. leo rider was saying how much for carb, which was actually posted the day before on the prev page. seriously, i still think leo rider's post was useless. he said price, but he didnt state WHERE. what use was that anyway? the page before already had the price stated there. i know price varies, but it's around that price yes?

 

i apologise for starting this kinda debate, i'll keep my opinions to myself next time. lets end this yes?

just because of yr sarcasm words coz leo rider so hot

[ravenSP]

i meant what i said though about the 'crap' and all that. i was being sarcastic? yeah maybe. i already stated my reasons.

 

shay honestly maybe u dun know my character .... ... i purposely divert the words to wait filbert to post and wat he had done .. so no offence to u

 

anyway i dont really get what you mean by this, do you want to elaborate through PM?

[Guest TachiTJRS]

Maybe you all didn't read my last post:

 

I hope my post will be the last on this matter. I hope after this everyone will return to other discussions.

[Soulmace]

Originally posted by Shay@Jan 11 2005, 02:25 PM

Newbies....u all wana know why your questions sometimes goes unanswered that is why!! When the pages gets too filled with mindless chatters, no one would wana read thru it all and sometimes misses all the tech questions.)

 

 

 

[Xiao_Di]

Originally posted by filbert@Jan 11 2005, 01:28 PM

some people (you know who you are) need to read properly. and no im not talking about you sean.

 

 

i posted those out of irritation. my bad. but sometimes it gets irritating when someone really posts replies and questions when they could get the info the page before. leo rider was saying how much for carb, which was actually posted the day before on the prev page. seriously, i still think leo rider's post was useless. he said price, but he didnt state WHERE. what use was that anyway? the page before already had the price stated there. i know price varies, but it's around that price yes?

 

i apologise for starting this kinda debate, i'll keep my opinions to myself next time. lets end this yes?

u dun need to said SOME PEOPLE (U KNOW WHO U ARE ) just said the name out is fine wif mi

 

u think u gets irritating i also gets irritating SOME PEOPLE POST ALSO

 

u think leo rider post is useless....i think wat he post is DAMN USELESS

 

he post the price($80) is ok if u go to a bike shop that change u $100 then u know the bike shop chop u or not

 

is ok wif mi if he got post where to change

[Xiao_Di]

i think some 1 here dun understand english go back pri sch study again lar

[Soulmace]

Originally posted by Xiao_Di@Jan 11 2005, 05:38 PM

i think some 1 here dun understand english go back pri sch study again lar

dude... relax man... this is just a thread...

 

if each can take a step back, i tink this argument will end

 

and if i dun see wrongly, filbert is wanting to end this too

[Xiao_Di]

Originally posted by Soulmace@Jan 11 2005, 05:41 PM

dude... relax man... this is just a thread...

 

if each can take a step back, i tink this argument will end

 

and if i dun see wrongly, filbert is wanting to end this too

ask him who wan to start 1st n end this now

[Soulmace]

Originally posted by Xiao_Di@Jan 11 2005, 06:51 PM

ask him who wan to start 1st n end this now

on Jan 11 2005, 01:28 PM , Filbert posted "i apologise for starting this kinda debate, i'll keep my opinions to myself next time. lets end this yes?"

 

Is my eyesight spoiled or wat, but i do read that he wants to end this in the afternoon.

[Ken]

Originally posted by BuZZBeaM@Jan 10 2005, 11:35 AM

my rvf manul up for sale too!!

Ken : if u r getting e same copy as mine, dun think its $20.. anyway upZ for u

Then i think mine is not same as your, but to clear it, will be going at $15.

 

So who wanna the manual ah?

[Xiao_Di]

Originally posted by Ken@Jan 11 2005, 08:04 PM

Then i think mine is not same as your, but to clear it, will be going at $15.

 

So who wanna the manual ah?

wat manual is that ?

[Ken]

U all post here post there to argue will not make the matter any easy. Its all about pride and face in this heated session. Even if u guys manage to solve this all here, u guys will have "Xing Bing" with each other next time. Soon, it will be groups forming in this thread. So, the best way to close this case is to meet up face to face to talk it out.

 

Let me decide a time and place for the involved personnel to sort it out.

 

Love Making Session

 

Venue: KKFC

Date: 14-01-05

Time: 8pm

 

Love Makers:

 

1)

2)

 

pls add ur name in.

[Ken]

Originally posted by Xiao_Di@Jan 11 2005, 08:16 PM

wat manual is that ?

RVF Service Manual. Photocopied.

 

I sense that u r a potential customer.

so when u want it? we can always meet up at a place.

[Soulmace]

Originally posted by Ken@Jan 11 2005, 08:19 PM

RVF Service Manual. Photocopied.

 

I sense that u r a potential customer.

so when u want it? we can always meet up at a place.

its the haynes for nc30 and 35 rite?

[Ken]

I also got a set of original rvf carb for sale at $450.

There's 4 individual carb in a set.

Mine got 1 damaged. Still got 3 working carbs.

If buy from bike shop, they will sell whole set but not individually as most probably its from a scrapped rvf.

I bought it for $600, so each will be $150.

1 of the syptom of damaged carb( most common problem is the carb is leaking fuel out) is fuel used up very fast.

[Ken]

Originally posted by Soulmace@Jan 11 2005, 08:23 PM

its the haynes for nc30 and 35 rite?

Yes.

U r a knowledgeable potential customer.

Pls book a time with me ASAP as it might be gone in less than 60 seconds~~

[Soulmace]

Originally posted by Ken@Jan 11 2005, 08:26 PM

Yes.

U r a knowledgeable potential customer.

Pls book a time with me ASAP as it might be gone in less than 60 seconds~~

ah its ok.. i'm getting one from one of my fren

[Ken]

I also got a Fitch Fuel Catalyst which can las tup to 400,000km(ride till ur bike renew COE also wont reach that milleage) for sale at $35. Just used for i think less than 1 month.

 

This fuel catalyst primary job is to keep ur fuel fresh and upgrade its octane level. Able to turn ur 2nd link petrol into sg V-Power. U pumped sg V-Power, it turn it into race fuel. Not joke or BS. Its true and tested out myself.

 

Reason to sell is it is comes in a pack which got 2 pieces.

Dropped 2 in to have the best performance but it increases the octane level by too much and thus decreasing my milleage. At 1st wanna take out both but, this thing is a must have for a 2nd link petrol lover like me. So i took 1 out and it work perfectly with both milleage going back to usual and given me the performance of sg V-Power.

[Ken]

Originally posted by Soulmace@Jan 11 2005, 08:30 PM

ah its ok.. i'm getting one from one of my fren

It's okie, but ur friend 1 sure not as good as mine, as mine is opened for less than 5 times. Not BS, i m a non technical guy, bought it just for fun and tot got pretty RVF model pictures, turns out all screws and nuts. Hiaks~ not for me.

[jungleboy111]

Originally posted by Ken+Jan 11 2005, 08:25 PM-->

QUOTE (Ken @ Jan 11 2005, 08:25 PM)

I also got a set of original rvf carb for sale at $450. There's 4 individual carb in a set. Mine got 1 damaged. Still got 3 working carbs. If buy from bike shop, they will sell whole set but not individually as most probably its from a scrapped rvf. I bought it for $600, so each will be $150. 1 of the syptom of damaged carb( most common problem is the carb is leaking fuel out) is fuel used up very fast. [/b] Maybe you can take some pictures. Let us view them?